The Betting Mole System is not very good. In fact, the Betting Mole System is rubbish. It is a 13 page ebook, only two pages of which concern themselves with the system rules.
The rules are as follows (without giving the game away)â€¦
Use these racetracks with Betting Mole, but donâ€™t use these other ones (even though there is no logic for not using the other ones)
- The horse should have won one of its recent races to be a Betting Mole qualifier (even though there is no consideration of more recent form)
- Of all race types, weâ€™ll ignore this specific one for Betting Mole purposes (purely and simply because it didnâ€™t make a profit â€“ no logical reason otherwise)
- Donâ€™t bet in low class races (this one is a fair rule, and I have nothing negative to say about that)
- Only bet if the horse ran within a certain number of days (again, fair enough)
And thatâ€™s it. Five rules, three of them hopelessly back-fitted and destined to send Betting Mole users back to Specsavers to help them see a bad betting system next time.
Â Claimed results for the system are as follows:
Â -Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Strike rate of 84%
Â -Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6687 selections
Â -Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Profit of 33 points per month
Â -Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Profit overall in last 23 months of Â£76,242 using Â£100 level stakes
Unfortunately, the results quoted winners (and therefore losers for this laying system) at SP, rather than Betfair SP or any other meaningful barometer.
If Iâ€™d ignored the back-fitted elements of the system, and used Masseyâ€™s interpretation of Betfair SP (a guesstimate but a reasonable one), Iâ€™d have had the following results over the past two years:
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Strike rate of 82.2%
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 8906 selections (or 13.5 selections a day!)
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â LOSS of 21 points per month
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â LOSS overall in the last 23 months of Â£46,621 using Â£100 level stakes
So, to recap, the Betting Mole is rubbish. Big losses, and literally hundreds of selections per month.
Avoid like the plague.