Trainers escape fines for Kempton withdrawals

Hannon - led criticism of Kempton surface

Trainer power is getting stronger. First there was the revolt over low prize money at Worcester that resulted in 11 trainers each receiving a fine of £140 for withdrawing their horses from a race. Now there is the treatment of trainers who have withdrawn their horses because of real dissatisfaction about the state of the newly re-laid Polytrack surface at Kempton.

During the three days of racing this week a total of 29 horses were declared non runners on the day of the race, and as the regulations require, their trainers were fiend £140 for each non runner. Richard Hannon was particularly critical of the surface, which he described as “simply not acceptable”, and made it clear he would appeal against his punishment. Others, including John Hills, and Jeremy Noseda followed suit.

Your first 30 days for just £1

In the light of such strong criticism the British Horseracing Authority cancelled the fines, despite the likely going having been well advertised by clerk of the course Barney Clifford. They said that the key factor in their leniency was that declarations for the three meetings closed before the new surface had been tried out under race conditions.

Spokesman for the BHA, Robin Mounsey, said that although they were satisfied that there had been sufficient notice of the going change, “The BHA has decided to waive the penalties imposed on trainers of horses who were withdrawn. We understand that a refurbished artificial surface will at first ride differently to what some horsemen might have expected. In this particular case, where the course staged three consecutive days’ racing, declarations were taken for the Tuesday’s and Wednesday’s meetings prior to anyone having had the opportunity to see how the surface was racing.”

The BHA went on to make it clear there would be no further fines rescinded, and that the in their view, trainers had just as much responsibility for checking the going at all-weather fixtures as at those run on turf. No doubt that is true, but as it’s so rare that all-weather tracks declare the going to be anything other than standard, you can quite understand that this is taken as a given, and not subject to day to day consideration.

But was the BHA genuinely understanding of the situation or did they fear another round of bad publicity at a time when they seem to be operating with more stability than over the last couple of years?

Your first 30 days for just £1
1 reply
  1. David says:

    I can understand the fines being waived since no-one could know how the surface was riding when declarations were made. However, to say that you are unaware of statements issued well in advance (John Hills!) is ridiculous. I knew about the going change and I’m not responsible for placing horses. No wonder we get frustrated as punters if those “in the know” clearly aren’t!!

    As for the new surface, most jockeys reported it as perfectly ok, albeit with a bedding in period being needed and the times recorded didn’t cause too much head scratching at this end.


Comments are closed.