Tag Archive for: Instant Expert

Racing Insights, Thursday 02/03/23

Thursday's free feature, the Instant Expert racecard tab is one of Geegeez readers' most popular tools because it has the unique ability to condense the entire form profile of every runner in the race into a single, easily digestible, view covering the form in terms of wins (or places), runs, and win (or place) percentage for each of going, class, course, distance, and field size.

It also compares today’s official rating with the horse’s last winning official rating. The display is colour coded: green for a higher percentage rate, amber for a middling percentage, and red for a low percentage. Horses with no form under a certain condition have grey figures.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Where a horse has no UK/Irish form – i.e. it is having its first run in Britain or Ireland under Rules – it will not show up on Instant Expert at all.

We make this feature freely available to ALL readers EVERY Thursday for ALL races, including, naturally, our selection of 'free' races as follows...

  • 2.50 Taunton
  • 3.00 Ludlow
  • 4.45 Ludlow
  • 4.55 Clonmel

...and purely based on feature of the day, Instant Expert, I'm going to look at the 3.00 Ludlow, a 6-runner, Class 3, 5yo+ handicap chase over a right handed three miles on good ground where the Instant Expert looks like this...

...suggesting a two-way battle between the two at the top of the weights, although Java Point (who won this race last year) would prefer it a little softer. He does however, have a good place record on good ground, so it's not a case of him not acting on it...

...and again it's the top two generating the most interest, so let's look at the card...

Quoi de Neuf and top weight Hidden Heroics both won last time out and the latter is three from four and seeks a hat-trick here, whilst only Flagrant Delitiep is without a win in five. Quoi du Neuf actually won over hurdles last time so, he's a class and 4lbs higher than that win, but Fuji Flight is down a class and Java Point's sixth place finish a month ago was in a Class 1 handicap. He's the only course and distance winner, courtesy of winning this race last year, Quoi de Neuf has won a 2m5½f hurdle contest here, Hidden Heroics won over 3m½f at Exeter whilst Fuji Flight has chase successes at both 2m7½f and 3m1f. Top weight and 'form' horse Hidden Heroics runs for the first time in twelve weeks, but the others  have all raced in the last month or so.

HIDDEN HEROICS had two wins and a runner-up finish from his last four over hurdles and is now two from two over fences winning by 23 and 45 lengths over longer trips than this, suggesting an 8lb hike in weight might not anchor him.

JAVA POINT has finished 21311326 in handicap chases so far and the only blot on that run was the unoplaced effort LTO, but that was in a tough £57k Class 1 contest. Has made the frame in a pair of Class 2's this year so far, so this is easier on paper, but he hasn't won in 11 months and is still 2lbs higher than that win on April Fool's Day.

LE CAMELEON is three from eight over fences in the last thirteen months, but since his last win (Warwick, 5 months ago) he fell at Fontwell and was 7th of 12 at Chepstow and last of five at Taunton. Still 1lb higher than that win and now asked to go further than ever before.

FUJI FLIGHT won two on the bounce around this time last year, but that moved his mark from 122 to 132 which held him back for a while, but he took advantage of a ratings drop to 128 to finish 3rd at Uttoxeter recently with a 5lb claimer on his back. No claimer today, but another pound off from the assessor puts him back to his last winning mark, so he'd hope to be competitive.

QUOI DE NEUF has won just one of ten over fences and that was on 9th December 2021, but did win by ten lengths at Ludlow over hurdles just eight days ago ending a run of seven defeats (5 over fences). Now 4lbs higher than that hurdles success and up in class.

FLAGRANT DELITIEP has 3 wins and 4 furher places from 15 over fences, which is reasonable enough, but virtually all his good from comes at Wincanton and over 2m4f-2m5f and since winning at Wincanton a year ago, he has been beaten by 45L, been pulled up and then beaten by 27, 15, 33 and 16 lengths.

Recent pace profiles suggest that the in-form Hidden Heroics might try to win this from the front, whilst Fuji Flight is a confirmed hold-up horse...

...but the leader might not have it all his own way, as only Java Point of the others doesn't have a tendency to take races on early and even when he won this race last year, he raced in snatches. Past similar small field contests here at Ludlow have gone the way of those setting the pace...

...so not entirely great for Java Point and not good at all for Fuji Point.

Summary

There's no getting away from Hidden Heroics. He's in great form, scores well on Instant Expert and has the ideal pace profile for this race. Yes, he's up 8lbs, but he did win by 45 lengths despite jumping to the right on a left-handed track. They go right handed here, so that might also help. He has to be the one to beat and the only surprise approaching 5pm is that he's not shorter than his current 13/8 price with Bet365.

We're not getting rich backing him at that price, though so we might need an E/W bet or one for forecast/exacta and from the other five, I really don't like Flagrant Delitiep for lots of reasons above and I'm not over enamoured with Le Cameleon, leaving me with three to choose from...

Java Point won this race last year and is running OK this year, he scored well on IE too but might get left for pace and would prefer the ground to be softer. Fuji Flight isn't in the best of form, didn't score too well on IE and as the only hold-up type could have too much to do later in the contest. That said, he gets the trip, he's on a workable mark and is down in class, whilst Quoi de Neuf will be up with the pace, but just doesn't win/place often enough over fences.

There's probably not much between the three and the tentative pick as my runner-up goes to last year's winner Java Point. He just seems to edge the others on all bar pace, but his yard know what's required here and the market know he's proven over track and trip, typified by his 4/1 ticket. I'm not really into backing the top two in the market, but there are times when it's the right thing and I think that's the case here.

Racing Insights, Thursday 23/02/23

Thursday's free feature, the Instant Expert racecard tab is one of Geegeez readers' most popular tools because it has the unique ability to condense the entire form profile of every runner in the race into a single, easily digestible, view covering the form in terms of wins (or places), runs, and win (or place) percentage for each of going, class, course, distance, and field size.

It also compares today’s official rating with the horse’s last winning official rating. The display is colour coded: green for a higher percentage rate, amber for a middling percentage, and red for a low percentage. Horses with no form under a certain condition have grey figures.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Where a horse has no UK/Irish form – i.e. it is having its first run in Britain or Ireland under Rules – it will not show up on Instant Expert at all.

We make this feature freely available to ALL readers EVERY Thursday for ALL races, including, naturally, our selection of 'free' races as follows...

  • 2.05 Sedgefield
  • 2.15 Huntingdon
  • 3.40 Thurles
  • 4.25 Sedgefield

..from which I'm going to look at the 4.25 Sedgefield, an 8-runner, Class 4, 4yo+ handicap hurdle over a left-handed 2m½f on good ground...

None of these managed a win last time out, but both Legendary Day and Start In Front were runners-up and now make a handicap debut over hurdles, as does Bertie's Wish. These three are also the only ones with a recent win to their name and they along with Lord Caprio bring the best form to the table. Plenty of these are running at a different class to LTO with only Bertie's Wish, Start In Front and They Call Me Pete having raced at Class 4 last time and the latter makes just a second handicap start. He'll wear first-time cheekpieces here, whilst it's also Bertie's Wish's first time in a hood.

Of the class movers, top weight and 12 yr old veteran Glimpse of Gold is the only class dropper after failing to complete his at two starts. The rest of the field (Legendary Day, Lord Caprio, North Parade & Golden Town) all step up from Class 5. They Call Me Pete is the only one yet to win at a similar trip to this one, whilst five of the pack (Legendary Day, Bertie's Wish, Lord Caprio, North Parade & Golden Town) have done it here at Sedgefield.

It's a little over three months since Lord Caprio was seen on a racecourse and Glimpse of Gold hasn't run since New Year's Day, but the others have all been out in the last two to four weeks. So far, my instincts are suggesting I spilt the pack and side with the three handicap debutants plus Lord Caprio, but time will tell. Feature of the Day is, of course, Instant Expert, so let's what that tells us about this field...

And it's a mixed bag, isn't it? The four I was interested in have good numbers off small sample sizes, Glimpse of Gold has a wealth of experience and has won his fair share of races and They Call Me Pete has yet to make the frame in five (1 x NHF, 4 x hrds) starts. North Parade has won here over course and distance almost a year ago, but that was the exception to his normal results and a 1 from 12 record at the trip isn't good at all, nor is the fact that he has failed to complete four of seven runs since the start of 2022.

As for bottom weight and another 12 yo veteran, Golden Town, it doesn't look great at all. Yes, he has made the frame in just a third of his 53 career outings, but he's only won 4 of 47 NH contests and hasn't made the frame in any of his last eleven starts going back to 2nd June 2021, when second at the yard's favoured track, Cartmel. At this point, Golden Town looks the weakest contender despite receiving weight all round.

The pace stats from these runners' most recent outings suggest that my preferred quartet will be spread through the pack...

...as Start In Front likes to do exactly that, but will probably have company early on from Glimpse of Gold and North Parade. Legendary Day is likely to race in midfield with Bertie's Wish and Lord Caprio our back markers and the analysis from past contests says that it's not easy to win or even make the frame from the back...

...so that's not ideal for the likes of Bertie's Wish and Lord Caprio.

Summary

Quite early on, I felt that the three handicap debutants (Legendary Day, Start In Front and Bertie's Wish) plus Lord Caprio made up the half of the field I'd want to be with. Bertie's Wish and Lord Caprio were the weaker pair on Instant Expert and also look troubled by the pace perspective, so I'm going to say their chances are much diminished and if they're battling it out for third place, that would be great.

As for the Legendary Day vs Start In Front conundrum, I don't think there's that much between them, but as Start In Front has a better pace profile for this race, gets nearly a stone from the other and is attractively priced, then an 11/2 bet on Start In Front could be the way forward.

Racing Insights, Thursday 16/02/23

Did you know that the Instant Expert tab is by far the most popular tab on the geegeez racecards?

That's because it has the ability to condense the entire form profile of every runner in the race into a single, easily digestible, view. The report covers the form in terms of wins (or places), runs, and win (or place) percentage for each of going, class, course, distance, and field size. It also compares today’s official rating with the horse’s last winning official rating. The display is colour coded: green for a higher percentage rate, amber for a middling percentage, and red for a low percentage. Horses with no form under a certain condition have grey figures.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Where a horse has no UK/Irish form – i.e. it is having its first run in Britain or Ireland under Rules – it will not show up on Instant Expert at all.

This GOLD feature is so important that we make freely available to ALL readers EVERY Thursday alongside our usual selection of FREE races which, for this Thursday are...

  • 2.15 Clonmel
  • 2.45 Newcastle
  • 4.45 Sandown
  • 6.00 Chelmsford

And of the three UK races, the last seems to have more for us in terms of Instant Expert, if not quality. It's the 6.00 Chelmsford, a 10-runner, Class 5, 4yo+ A/W handicap over a left-handed 6f on standard polytrack...

Old-timer Muscika was a winner last time out, as was Thismydream, whilst Magical Max, Bezzas Lad and Jupiter Express were all in the frame. El Hombre won three starts back, ad did Jupiter Express and Bezza's Lad is 212 in his last three, but half of the field (Magical Max, Bang On the Bell, Desert Boots, Mustaffiz and Autumn Flight) are winless on their visible form line.

Both Bang On The Bell and LTO winner Muscika drop in class today, but the bottom four on the card (Jupiter Express, Desert Boots, Mustaffiz and Autumn Flight) are up one grade. All bar Bang On The Bell (2 months off) have raced in the last six weeks with both Desert Boots and Autumn Flight turned back out fairly quickly after just six and three days rest respectively.

Both Muscika and El Hombre are former course and distance winners (the former is 2 from 3 over C&D), whilst Autumn Flight has won here over his preferred 5f, but did win over today's trip at Bath. Magical Max, Bang On The Bell, Bezza's Lad and Desert Boots have also scored elsewhere over today's trip.

So, we've three course winners (2 at C&D) and all bar three with a 6f win, but it's time to check in with feature of the day Instant Expert for the going/class/weight stats...

Autumn Flight is two from six at this track, but it's all over 5f and his going, class and distance stats are very poor. The top half of the field looks the stronger with Muscika probably standing out, but there's a lot of red going on in that graphic, so maybe the IE place stats will yield more for us...

Well, it doesn't really solve the "who to back?" conundrum, but it does highlight Mustaffiz's deficiencies and the depth of Muscika's experience and he has to be a contender dropping in class after an LTO win without a change in his "mark". He made virtually all to win as he does normally other than two starts ago when he was inexplicably tardy in getting going, resulting in his worst run for some time.

One suspects, however, based on the field's recent outings that he won't have it all his own way up front, if the following is anything to go by...

There may well be a battle for the lead early doors, but I'm fairly sure that Desert Boots will sit that out and I'm even more sure that that isn't generally a great tactic here at Chelmsford over 6f, but let's look at facts rather than opinions, courtesy of the Geegeez Pace Analyser...

And this shows that leaders win 1.41 times more often than prominent runners, who in turn win 1.51 times more often than in mid-division who win a staggering 2.56 times more often hold-up horses. Hold-ups are almost 5.5 times less likely to win than leaders and whilst that gap isn't as wide on the place results, leaders still make the frame more often than the others and this inferred pace bias is far more important than the draw here, as shown by the Draw Analyser...

...which is pretty inconclusive, but the pace/draw heat map is centred around  leaders with any running style and high drawn prominence...

Summary

Working backwards from that pace/draw heat map and the pace stats, I want to be working with the four most likely to contest the lead ie Jupiter Express, Thismydream, Muscika and Bezza's Lad, but adding Magical Max to the mix. He's drawn high and likes to race prominently.

If I'm working with this half of the field, I think Magical Max and Thismydream would be the weaker picks, Thismydream did indeed win LTO, but it was a Novice event and his first ever win coming at the 23rd attempt and he's now 4lb higher than his last handicap run where he was only fourth of seven. Magical Max is on a 10-race losing run, since scoring on his First two career outings and although second on his A/W debut over this course and distance six weeks ago, he's inexperienced in this sphere and the loss of his claimer jockey effectively makes him 3lbs worse off than a defeat to El Hombre.

Which leaves us with the 3/1 fav Jupiter Express, 6/1 shot and Bezza's Lad and my preference the 4/1 Muscika. All have a great chance of winning this and all look suited by the pace profile required here, but Muscika caught the eye in Instant Expert, comes here in form and escapes a penalty for an LTO win, thus possibly offering the best value for money of the trio.

Racing Insights, Thursday 09/02/22

Thursday's free feature, the Instant Expert racecard tab is one of Geegeez readers' most popular tools because it has the unique ability to condense the entire form profile of every runner in the race into a single, easily digestible, view covering the form in terms of wins (or places), runs, and win (or place) percentage for each of going, class, course, distance, and field size.

It also compares today’s official rating with the horse’s last winning official rating. The display is colour coded: green for a higher percentage rate, amber for a middling percentage, and red for a low percentage. Horses with no form under a certain condition have grey figures.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Where a horse has no UK/Irish form – i.e. it is having its first run in Britain or Ireland under Rules – it will not show up on Instant Expert at all.

We make this feature freely available to ALL readers EVERY Thursday for ALL races, including, naturally, our selection of 'free' races as follows...

  • 1.40 Doncaster
  • 4.10 Huntingdon
  • 5.40 Newcastle
  • 6.40 Newcastle

...from which I'm going to look at the 4.10 Huntingdon, an open-looking 9-runner, Class 2, 4yo+ handicap hurdle over a right handed 2m3½f on good ground...

GALORE DESASSENCES won at this trip on his last hurdles run (2 starts ago) and his record in cheekpieces over hurdles reads 113P1 with the '3' coming in a Kempton Grade 2 almost a year ago. He's 12lbs higher than last win, where he was comfortably clear of the pack by 12 lengths, but he could have won by more and might not be weighted out of this just yet.

WEST CORK won back to back hurdles races here in the 2019/20 season and was a Grade 3 hurdle winner at Cheltenham in November 2021 and had three subsequent decent efforts at that level before a fall 3 out at Haydock last May. he took six months off and has raced over fences since his return in November, but was last home of three three starts ago prior to being pulled up in his last two. Now back over hurdles 5lbs higher than his last Grade 3 win.

HUNTERS CALL won on his 2021 seasonal reappearance at Bangor over today's trip, but that was the highlight of his winter, until finishing a runner-up at Uttoxeter in April. He was then off for over six months, before starting this campaign back at Bangor in November when third of nine off 3lbs higher than today.

SONIGINO had a wind op during his summer break last year and won both starts back in a pair of Class 3, 2m½f contests at Chepstow in October, but found a 2-class & 10lb rise too much next/last time out, when almost 30 lengths adrift as 8th of 13 at Cheltenham two months ago. Some respite here as he's down a class and 2lbs.

GIPSY DE CHOISEL ran and won once in France (soft ground, 2m3f, May 2020), but took five races to get off the mark here in the UK, scoring over 2m (class 3, good) at Warick to end his season in mid-May. He returned in November up in class and weight to finish 5th of 9, beaten by 12 lengths and now makes a 3½f step up in trip.

BOURBALI was excellent last season, starting off over today's trip at Class 5 off a mark of 101 and finished 1432111, culminating in a Class 3 win off 124. More recently he was 3rd of 10 over 2m5f at Cheltenham in November off 126 and then 2nd of 15 at the same trip/weight at Kempton on Boxing Day. Up 2lbs and one class here but down in trip.

TOO FRIENDLY won his first two over hurdles in October/November 2021 as a 3yo, both over 2m½f on good to soft ground, but one at Class 4 and one at Class 2. More recently has been the runner-up in each of his last two, but is up in class, trip and weight here.

HYDROPLANE is 4 from 14 over hurdles, but hasn't 'jumped' since mid-March, when a 16-lengths 10th of 22 in a Sandown Grade 3 hurdle. Has raced three times over 2m on the Flat/AW since finishing 163 and now reverts to hurdles at the same class/mark as his last NH success 13 months ago.

MOVEIT LIKE MINNIE had an eight month break last year returning in late November and has finished 121 in three starts since, all under today's 5lb claimer and although he's clearly in good nick, he's 10lbs and two classes higher here. He won at this track last time out and won over this trip at Taunton in November, but the big jump in weight/class could be an issue.

Instant Expert gives us a clear overview of a field's past record under expected conditions as follows...

...and underfoot conditions shouldn't be too much of an issue here. Galore des Assences is only 1 from 5 on good, but has made the frame in 2 of 4 defeats and has won on both quicker and slower ground than this, whilst Too friendly has a pair of runner-up finishes in his last two on good ground, but wouldn't mind a bit of rain! Most of the field are largely unproven/untested at this level, although several of them have Class 1 experience (West Cork has made the frame in 4 of 6 inc 1 win) and that lack of experience also extends to this course, but those who have run here previously seem to have handled it OK with three of them sharing 3 wins and a place from 5 visits.

As for the trip, again those with experience have handled it well, although you could say that Hunters Call looks like more of a placer than a winner, but at just 1lb above his last winning mark, he's very well treated here, especially in comparison to Galore Des Assences at +12 and Sonigino at +8 etc, but at this point, I wouldn't rule any of these out from making the frame, including top-weight Galore!

We should remember that he's up 12lbs for a facile 12 length win that could have been 20 or 30 lengths had they wanted to. Now, he generally runs in mid-division or a little further back without actually been held up at the back, which is probably where six-time Class 1 runner West Cork is likely to be in a race that will probably be headed by the likes of Sonigino, although Gipsy de Choisel and Bourbali have both led in recent outings...

...and if I was to split the field into the four Geegeez running styles, I'd probably say...

Leader(s) : Sonigino (possibly Bourbali)

Prominent : Bourbali, Gipsy de Choisel, Move It Like Minnie

Mid-Division : Galore Des Assences, Hunters Call, Too Friendly, Hydroplane

Hold-Up : West Cork

We can then look at how this type of race has unfolded here at Huntingdon in the past (I now cross my fingers for some clarity!) via the Geegeez Pace Analyser...

...where leaders/prominent runners are nearly 2.75 times more likely to win and 1.66 times more likely to place than those racing further back, which is better news for the likes of Sonigino, Bourbali, Gipsy de Choisel and Move It Like Minnie.

Summary

The race itself looks fiendishly difficult to call but Move It Like Minnie interests me, because he's in great form and will race prominently enough to stay in touch, but he's massively up in weight and class and whilst he might pull out a career-best here, I don't want to back him as low as 7/2. If I then remain with the pace runners, Sonigino is the likely pace-maker and he's down in class and weight here, but might need more assistance before winning again, I'd normally be interested in him as an E/W bet, but again 6/1 doesn't excite me for that type of punt.

Gipsy de Choisel is priced at 7's, which again is a little short for me as an E/W bet, but he looks a decent type, who'll need to bounce back from a disappointing return to action at Ascot in November, which I suppose leaves us with Bourbali, who we know will be towards the head of the pack. I'm not convinced he wins here up in class and weight, but was in great form this last year and comes here off the back of two good runs making the frame at big prices. He has 3 wins and 2 places from 8 on good ground and 4 wins/2 places from 7 at this trip, so he's be my idea of an E/W option at 9/1, especially if you can get on with a firm paying four places.

There's every possibility that I've overlooked the winner in that quartet or even amongst the other five, but I didn't have a strong view on the contest as a whole and when that's the case, I tend not to pick a winner, but look for an option to make the frame at an acceptable price.

 

Racing Insights, Thursday 02/02/23

Thursday's free feature, the Instant Expert racecard tab is one of Geegeez readers' most popular tools because it has the unique ability to condense the entire form profile of every runner in the race into a single, easily digestible, view covering the form in terms of wins (or places), runs, and win (or place) percentage for each of going, class, course, distance, and field size.

It also compares today’s official rating with the horse’s last winning official rating. The display is colour coded: green for a higher percentage rate, amber for a middling percentage, and red for a low percentage. Horses with no form under a certain condition have grey figures.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Where a horse has no UK/Irish form – i.e. it is having its first run in Britain or Ireland under Rules – it will not show up on Instant Expert at all.

We make this feature freely available to ALL readers EVERY Thursday for ALL races, including, naturally, our selection of 'free' races as follows...

  • 2.30 Wincanton
  • 3.00 Wincanton
  • 4.35 Southwell
  • 5.30 Chelmsford

..from which I'm going to look at the 3.00 Wincanton, a 14-runner, Class 3, 5yo+ handicap chase over a right handed 3m1½f on good to soft ground. It's a stayers' chase, which I do like but 14 runners takes me out of my comfort zone, so I want to quickly cross some of them off and I'll do that by going straight to Instant Expert...

...where I immediately don't like the bottom two on the card. Putdecashonthedash is unplaced in nine runs on good to soft and seven Class 3 races plus is only 1 from 7 on this track, whilst Butterwick Brook has won just one of ten at this grade and one of eleven at 3m-3m2f. They're the two that I'd take out first, but as this kind of race isn't my metier, I'm probably looking initially for an E/W bet, so I'm actually going to rule any out who are in the red for place form at going, class, course or distance and that actually leaves me with just nine...

I left Foxboro in, because he's only had the one run at the trip, but on win stats, he now looks the most vulnerable...

...but now to the racecard itself...

...where sole LTO winner Certainly Red comes seeking a hat-trick and a fourth win in five. Potters Legend is the only one without a relatively recent win and at 13, he's the oldest in the race and hasn't won any of his last ten over almost two years. He has made the frame in three of his last five, though, but is up 3lbs here. Tallow for Coal, Nearly Perfect and Moroder were all pulled up last time out, but Moroder had won four straight prior to that run, Tallow For Coal had two wins and a runner-up finish from four, whilst Nearly Perfect was coming back off a 711-day absence and is now back on the same mark as his last win, a course and distance success here on Boxing Day 2020.

He's actually 2 from 2 over course and distance, whilst Certainly Red and Golden Sovereign have also won at this track/trip. None of the others have won here before, but all bar Foxboro have at least won at a similar trip and most of his running has been at 2m4f/2m4½f and I think he's the weakest here now, as we look at pace profiling.

With Foxboro discarded, I'm now looking at 8 runners for four places (5 with Skybet), so I'm still optimistic of finding an E/W bet. The eight remaining runners have raced as follows in their four outings...

...whilst past previous similar races here at this venue have panned out like this...

...which would suggest a pace score in the region of 2.00 to 3.00 for my E/W punt. So, from the eight above, I'm leaving Certainly Red (who I actually think will win, more on that shortly), Nearly Perfect and Champagne Court out of the running, giving me just five to consider.

Summary

When I refer back to Instant Expert (specifically chase form) for my final decision...

...the two that interest me most are Tallow For Coal and Moroder.

Tallow for Coal should enjoy the conditions here, her yard and jockey are in good form, she gets on well with her rider and these stats are of interest...

He didn't go well last time out, but was still pitching in when a mistake 4 out effectively ended his chances, yet prior to that run, he had won two of his previous four outings and has a month to get over his latest exertions.

As for Moroder, he also looks well suited by conditions but needs to bounce back after a poor effort last time out. He won four on the bounce in three months from December 2021, elevating his mark from 113 to a huge 135. He was then off track for nine months returning on New Year's Eve for a first run off that revised mark and it was probably a combination of the weight and the lay-off that saw him toil and get pulled up.

He's down three pounds here and whilst that doesn't get him into the winner's enclosure, I think he has a chance of making the frame. He has stamina to burn, loves the ground and is still relatively unexposed over fences, whilst his yard are 10 from 23 (43.5% SR) with Class 3/4 handicap chasers over 2m7.5f to 3m2.5f on Good/Good To Soft/Soft ground since the start of 2021.

Neither of these are winning but both have chances of a place and at odds of 10/1 and 33/1 respectively, they could be worth backing. As for the winner, that really should be the in-form Certainly Red, who seems to have it all going for him right now. He's a best priced 9/2 with Bet365 which is probably about right, despite it being a pretty big field.

Racing Insights, Thursday 26/01/23

Thursday's free feature, the Instant Expert racecard tab is one of Geegeez readers' most popular tools because it has the unique ability to condense the entire form profile of every runner in the race into a single, easily digestible, view covering the form in terms of wins (or places), runs, and win (or place) percentage for each of going, class, course, distance, and field size.

It also compares today’s official rating with the horse’s last winning official rating. The display is colour coded: green for a higher percentage rate, amber for a middling percentage, and red for a low percentage. Horses with no form under a certain condition have grey figures.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Where a horse has no UK/Irish form – i.e. it is having its first run in Britain or Ireland under Rules – it will not show up on Instant Expert at all.

We make this feature freely available to ALL readers EVERY Thursday for ALL races, including, naturally, our selection of 'free' races as follows...

  • 1.00 Southwell
  • 1.35 Southwell
  • 2.15 Gowran Park
  • 4.10 Wincanton

..from which I'm going to look at the 1.35 Southwell, a 7-runner, Class 3, 3yo A/W handicap over a left handed mile on standard tapeta...

...which is likely, to all intents and purposes, to develop into a 4-horse race between the top four on the card.

They're the 'form' horses here with Brave Emperor winning his last three, Gincident his last two and Dagmar Run/Mohatu following up wins with runner-up finishes. That said, Naomi's Charm won two starts ago and Look back Smiling has made the frame in each of his last two, making Shot of Love the weakest on form.

All seven are up at least one class from LTO with Gincident, Shot Of Love and Look Back Smiling up two levels, whilst Shot of Love joins the top three on the card in having just a second handicap run. Mohatu and Gincident have both won over a mile, but Naomi's Charm is a course and distance winner.

Brave Emperor completed his hat-trick almost 11 weeks now, but the rest of the field have been away for less than three weeks.

The above says 1 course winner (C&D), 3 distance winners and Instant Expert says (overall) four winners on standard going and one at Class 3...

...and despite the lack of data, Brave Emperor would be the standout here with Naomi's Charm let down by her 1/4 on standard going. Mind you, she's 0/3 on std-slow! As on previous occasions that I've covered Southwell for this piece, we have to have the new track caveat ie we don't have masses of pace/draw data for the new surface, but we'll do our best with what we do have, starting with the draw...

There's not a lot in it from such a small sample size, but if pushed I'd probably want to be in stalls 3-6 to give me the best chance of making the frame, which only really benefits Dagmar Run from our 'favoured four', whilst the pace stats from those races, as is often the case here, tend to favour those racing furthest forward...

and when we look at how this field has raced recently...

...I'd guess that Naomi's Charm and Brave Emperor will set the pace with Mohatu having to pass runners to get involved.

Summary

There's not much to talk about from the above, sadly, but I think the best horses get their own way in these small fields and that it really becomes a test of who is best on the day. I stick with the assertion that the top four on the card get home first and based on the evidence (or lack of!) above, then the 3/1 2nd fav Brave Emperor would be the one to beat.  Mohatu looks plenty short at 7/4 if he runs from a hold-up position, but should have enough to make the frame.

If either of two fail to fire, then I've a slight preference for Dagmar Run at 5's over Gincident at 7/2 with the latter up two classes. Could be a decent little race, this one.

Racing Insights, Thursday 19/01/23

Did you know that the Instant Expert tab is by far the most popular tab on the geegeez racecards?

That's because it has the ability to condense the entire form profile of every runner in the race into a single, easily digestible, view. The report covers the form in terms of wins (or places), runs, and win (or place) percentage for each of going, class, course, distance, and field size. It also compares today’s official rating with the horse’s last winning official rating. The display is colour coded: green for a higher percentage rate, amber for a middling percentage, and red for a low percentage. Horses with no form under a certain condition have grey figures.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Where a horse has no UK/Irish form – i.e. it is having its first run in Britain or Ireland under Rules – it will not show up on Instant Expert at all.

This GOLD feature is so important that we make freely available to ALL readers EVERY Thursday alongside our usual selection of FREE races which, thanks to the weather have been reduced to...

  • 1.55 Wolverhampton
  • 7.30 Kempton

...and as a Class 2 Conditions Stakes should be better than a Class 5 fillies' maiden, we're off to the 7.30 Kempton, a 6-runner, Class 2 contest over  a right-handed 6f on standard to slow polytrack...

We should start with the elephant in the room, the faact that Annaf is very likely to go off as an odd-on favourite and he and Kiwano both won last time out, but Haziym and Tone The Barone are winless in at least five. Tinker Toy has a win and two runner-up finishes from his last four, whilst Aramis Grey goes one better with two wins and two runner-up spots.

Annaf is noted as a fast finisher and at just 5 days since his last run, he's the one who has had the least rest. Kiwano has also raced this year, but all six have been seen in the last month. Kiwano now steps up in class after his win 12 days ago.

Tinker Toy is the only one yet to win at the trip, whilst both Kiwano and Aramis Grey have both won over course and distance. It's not a handicap, of course, but based on official ratings vs weight, Tinker Toy is best off by a pound with Kiwano worst off.

Feature of the day, Instant Expert, is another positive vote for our fav...

Tone The Barone has proven himself in this grade and Kiwano is 2 from 2 here, whilst Aramis Grey's two wins and two runner-up finishes on this track isn't too shabby. She's 2 from 3 over course and distance whilst Kiwano has over 6f and 7f. The mare is, of course, very good over this trip. What the above doesn't tell you is that she has 6 wins and 7 further places from 17 under today's jockey.

She's drawn in stall 1 here with the fav in stall 4 and our draw analyser suggests the mare has the better of the two draws, but maybe not as good as Tinker Toy in box 2...

That said, it's a 6f sprint around a bend on the A/W and I've a feeling that Aramis Grey won't be the first to the turn based on this field's recent outings...

There's no automatic lead-out horse, but Kiwano is the one I'd expect to set the pace over a track and trip where, in fairness, only mid-division horses have struggled...

...which is probably the first negative for Annaf here.

Summary

Annaf should be winning this and if you've deep pockets, you could make some money but at the stakes I play at, odds of 10/11 don't excite me and to be honest I didn't think it was that clear-cut, 11/8 or 6/4 might be a fairer price. However, that means some of the others might be longer than expected.

If Annaf is set aside as a likely winner, I'll also set aside Tone The Barone and Haziym from my calculations. The former is winless in six and hasn't even looked like making the frame, plus he's on track debut here, whilst the latter was a well-beaten last of seven on his UK debut on Boxing Day.

This leaves me with three for one place and there's not much to separate the three, but 7/2 shot Tinker Toy is probably better over 7f and hasn't yet won on poly track, 4/1 priced Kiwano has a good record here at Kempton but is worst off at the weights by some margin, whilst the 9/1 price about Aramis Grey looks quite big to me. She's proven at the track, trip (track & trip!) and going, gets on great with her jockey and is in decent form (1122) giving her a reasonable shot at making the frame.

Over To You, #1

In the first of a new and occasional - maybe very occasional if nobody else wants to share what they're doing! - series, we free up the stage for a Geegeez Gold subscriber 'show and tell'. This inaugural episode features Gold user Rob Bayliss talking about how he combines various elements of the service to find value bets.

Before I virtually hand over to Rob, could we showcase your Gold experiences? To appear in this slot on site, you'll need to record a video of between five and twenty minutes duration, with screen capture and clear audio. Free screen capture software (you press a button and it records your screen) is available here. (I use the paid version of this software)

Simply upload your video to the web (Screencast-o-Matic has a button to upload to their cloud servers) and send us a message with the video link and a line on what you do and why.

We can't guarantee to use all videos, but if you have an angle you're happy to share and can produce a short(ish) recording of how/why you do things the way you do, there's a great chance we'll be able to use it. And thanks in advance, really looking forward to seeing how you make Gold work for you!

Right, enough said, over to Rob...

Racing Insights, Thursday 12/01/23

Thursday's feature of the day is full access for all readers to the Instant Expert tab on the racecards. This is by far the most popular tab in the geegeez racecards. The reason? It has the ability to condense the entire form profile of every runner in the race into a single, easily digestible, view.

The report covers the form in terms of wins (or places), runs, and win (or place) percentage for each of going, class, course, distance, and field size. It also compares today’s official rating with the horse’s last winning official rating. The display is colour coded: green for a higher percentage rate, amber for a middling percentage, and red for a low percentage. Horses with no form under a certain condition have grey figures.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Where a horse has no UK/Irish form – i.e. it is having its first run in Britain or Ireland under Rules – it will not show up on Instant Expert at all. And every Thursday we make this open to all readers for all races, including our free ones, which will be...

  • 12.15 Clonmel
  • 2.50 Catterick
  • 3.35 Newcastle
  • 3.55 Catterick

As ever, I do like to look at the extremes of racing and that leads me to the 2.50 Catterick, a 7-runner, Class 3, 5yo+ handicap chase over 3m6f on heavy ground...

None of these come here off the back of a winning run, but Bushypark and the sole mare in the race, Legend's Ryde, did at least make the frame whilst Burbank, Cyclop & Sam's Adventure all failed to finish. Burbank and legend's Ryde are the only two with a 'recent' win. Burbank and Sam's Adventure both now drop down from Class 2 and the latter now wears a first-time visor, whilst Cyclop's last outing was in a Class 1 handicap.

Bushypark was a runner-up last Saturday after having been pulled up in all four runs in 2022 and he's back out just five days later. That said, all his rivals have raced in the last six weeks. The mare Legend's Ryde is the 'baby' of the field at the age of eight, whilst Cyclops, the sole distance winner is now the ripe old age of 12.

Feature of the day is Instant Expert, so let's look at this field's overall NH form and also just chase stats...

Generally Burbank and Thunderosa haven't gone well in the mud and the latter is probably the weakest runner in the race and hasn't really impressed at in making the frame just once in ten starts over fences. Four of these are Class 3 winners, although it has taken Cyclops thirty races to amass just three wins, but he is also the only distance winner in the field. Only Thunderosa has raced here previously.

Onto chase form...

...which looks a little more promising from a going/class perspective, but no real stand-out candidate. Thunderosa still looks the weakest, as he did when last home of four here on New Year's Day. He was held up in rear that day and never landed a blow in a near-40 length defeat. Those tactics were unusual for a horse who normally races towards the head of affairs as shown on our pace logs...

...and if reverts to his usual tactics, he could well keep Bushypark company in the early stages of a race on a track that hasn't been too kind to hold-up horses in staying chases in the mud...

...but those leading the way have thrived and I suspect this will help Bushypark more than Thunderosa who has yet to prove himself as a stayer.

Summary

The one I initially like here is Legend's Ryde. She ran well at Cheltenham last out and was third of six in a Listed race in November. She likes the mud and gets on really well with jockey Gavin Sheehan and with three wins/two further places from nine over fences, she's a good benchmark for this field.

My doubts about her stem from the fact that she's only gone beyond three miles on four occasions and has never raced further than her 3m2½f win at Fontwell last March. I've had a quick look at the market and I can't back her at 3/1, it's just too short for me with those doubts about the trip.

The other one posing a conundrum is 5/2 favourite Bushypark. He won over hurdles in Feb'21 and then next time out, but over fences nearly ten months later off a mark of 132. He was raised to 137 and toiled, going down by almost 90 lengths at the end of 2021.

He was then pulled up in all four runs last year, but was then a runner-up at Newcastle last week, only headed late on in a 1.5 length defeat. He's unexposed (3 starts inc 1 win) over fences and is 13lbs lower than his last winning mark and if in the same mood as last week, should be the one to beat. 5/2 is a bit skinny, but i think that's down to a lack of real opposition.

Dream Conditions For Century In Celebration Mile

Soft ground seems to have scared many runners away this weekend leaving us with a day of largely smaller field races. The highest class race of the day is the Group 2 Celebration Mile at Goodwood and that’s going to be the focus of this article. One of the most popular features of Geegeez Gold is the ‘Instant Expert’ and I’m going to use the Instant Expert to gain a quick overview of the seven runners set to take part in this race.

Place Data

First let’s take a look at it from a place perspective:

Instant Expert Place Data

Ground

I’ve set the going parameter to anything from good to soft down to heavy. We are probably going to be looking at soft, borderline heavy ground for this race but this should allow us to get more data. We can dig deeper into what specific going each horse has handled or not handled later.

It seems that Century Dream and Sir Busker stand out as two runners that not only handle cut in the ground, but relish it. Century Dream has had the most runs on testing ground and has impressively placed in seven of his ten runs. Sir Busker is next best with four placings from six runs on ground that is good to soft or softer.

There is limited evidence about Urban Icon’s ability to handle cut in the ground as he’s had just two runs in these conditions, placing in one of those.

Interestingly enough Regal Reality and Benbatl, the two early favourites have failed to place in over 50% of their races in this sort of going. Between them they’ve managed just three placings in nine starts. The only runners in this field to have never placed on softer ground are Duke Of Hazzard and Positive who seem to have been kept away from softer ground as often as possible and with good reason.

Class

Century Dream again comes out on top having placed in five out of eight runs in class 1 races. Duke Of Hazzard and Positive, who scored poorly on this ground, actually score very well here. That’s not a big help though if they don’t go on the ground.

Urban Icon, Regal Reality and Benbatl have poorer records in class 1 races but it’s worth remembering this will include anything from listed contests to Group 1 races and there can be more merit in finishing 4th in a Group 1 than 1st in a listed race. We’ll dig deeper into the race class later.

Sir Busker is the only one of these to be running in a class 1 race for the first time.

Course

At a course as unique as Goodwood course form is always a positive. There is one clear winner here and that is Duke Of Hazzard who has never been out of the frame in four starts. Sir Busker has placed in two of his three runs. It’s fair to say that no runner is this field has run poorly at this venue.

Distance

You’d expect most runners in a Group 2 to have a solid record over the race distance but it’s worth noting that the favourite here, Benbatl, has managed just one placing in five runs at a mile. This stat really stands out and along with the ground stats for Benbatl suggests he has a poor profile for this race.

Like Benbatl, Regal Reality is another who scored badly on this ground and also has a poor record over this distance whilst Urban Icon is another with a sub 50% placing ratio at a mile.

Century Dream continues to score well with the best ratio here having placed in 67% of his runs over a mile.

Field Size

Often an underrated criteria, many horses are better suited to bigger fields and others to smaller fields. Yet again Century Dream is looking good having placed in all his runs in field sizes of 7 or less.

The stand out here is Regal Reality’s record in small fields. He’s managed to place in just two of his eight runs in field sizes this small.

Placings Summary

Without having to dig deep into the form Instant Expert has shown us that Century Dream is the really solid horse in this race. Sir Busker also scores well in most categories but is unproven (having been untried) in this sort of company. Duke Of Hazzard looks pretty good but there are serious ground concerns.

At the other end of the scale, Benbatl and Regal Reality, look two of the riskier propositions despite their positions in the market.

Win Data

This is what Instant Expert looks like for win purposes. We are getting less data here but the data we do get should be more telling.

Instant Expert Win Data

Once again Century Dream is coming out very well on all criteria except course as he is yet to run at Goodwood. Sir Busker is another who looks solid and a good proposition over a mile on testing ground at Goodwood. He’s yet to prove himself in this company and perhaps the biggest question mark for this horse is his ability to run well in smaller fields.

Duke Of Hazzard is interesting based on his course record of three wins from four starts. He also has a decent enough strike rate at this distance and in small fields. He’s had only one run on softer ground and finished unplaced so that’s the big unknown.

Early favourite Benbatl only really seems to have small field ability in his favour for win purposes whilst Regal Reality is unbeaten at Goodwood but other than that most of the elements that make up this race seem against him.

Positive scores poorly for wins in any of these circumstances except field size, and even a sole victory from three starts in small fields isn’t that great on the face of things. Meanwhile there is little evidence that Urban Icon will be at home in this race.

Digging Deeper

So far we have a very positive profile for Century Dream, a generally positive one for Sir Busker and a big ground question mark over Duke Of Hazzard. It also seems Benbatl and Regal Reality might be worth taking on.

Let’s first look at Duke Of Hazzard’s ground preference as he may be easy to rule out on that basis. Instant Expert is only able to look at runs from the UK and Ireland and a deeper look at Duke Of Hazzard’s form tells us he’s actually run three times on ground softer than good. Two of those runs were perhaps slightly below par but in Group 1 company so finishing unplaced wasn’t a disgrace. He also finished 2nd in a listed race at Deauville on good to soft. It doesn’t look as though he’s hopeless on softer ground and he clearly goes very well at Goodwood but there has to be a suspicion he is at his best on fast ground and it will probably take a near career best to win this.

Are Benbatl and Regal Reality really no hopers in this race despite their odds? Benbatl is the highest rated runner in this field and has largely been contesting Group 1 races over the past few years so having more unplaced efforts isn’t the end of the world. Looking at the ground though, he has been beaten favourite on softer than good on three of his four starts in those conditions (and was well beaten over too far a trip on his other attempt). The worse the ground gets, the worse he performs it seems.

Benbatl also had some worrying stats in races over a mile. Two of his five runs at a mile came on heavy ground. Those runs are relevant here as the going may not be far off heavy but they aren’t poof that he isn’t effective at a mile. He’s won over this trip at Group 2 level in the past so he’s clearly capable of winning this sort of race at this distance but it backs up the suspicion that the ground will be too soft for him.

Regal Reality was an impressive winner last time out over this trip at Group 3 level (good to firm). That was in an 8 runner field which perhaps allays fears he doesn’t act in smaller fields (he does have a poor record when there are 7 or fewer runners). All his wins outside of maiden company have been on good to firm ground though and whilst he’s placed on softer ground it’s worth noting that his only defeat from four runs at Group 3 level came on soft ground. The ground is the main reason to oppose Regal Reality but the fact he’s not won above Group 3 level in eight attempts is also a concern for his backers.

That leaves us with Century Dream and Sir Busker. Century Dream looks extremely solid based on Instant Expert so let’s see if he has any limitations. He’s never run at Goodwood but there is nothing in his profile that suggests he won’t handle the course. Possibly the best evidence we can get is to look at the Instant Expert for this race but from the sires’ perspectives.

Instant Expert Sire Data

Cape Cross’ offspring have run nine times at Goodwood in the past two years producing two winners. That might not seem a massive win ratio but it’s only bettered by Sire Prancelot (sire of Sir Busker) here and even then that’s by just 1%.

Let’s now look at Century Dreams’ defeats in Group company over a mile with cut in the ground. His two career unplaced efforts in these conditions came in an Ascot handicap on good to soft ground where perhaps it wasn’t quite soft enough for him and again at Ascot in a Group 1. In fact this horse has won just once from seven starts at Ascot (33% strike rate elsewhere) so it might not be his ideal course, for all he is Group 1 placed there on soft ground. Away from Ascot his only defeat over mile on softish ground was a 2nd in a listed race at Newmarket.

It would be hard to argue that Century Dream isn’t good enough to win this Group 2. His only run so far at this level was a 4th in the Summer Mile at Ascot on unsuitable good to firm ground. He has won both his starts at Group 3 level comfortably and has previously got within ¾ of a length of Roaring Lion in the QEII stakes at Ascot (possibly not his favourite track).

Can Sir Busker defeat him? He’s been a rapid improver this season, going up 19lbs in just 5 runs and he’s still relatively unexposed at this distance. He was slightly unlucky not to win a competitive handicap last time out off 107 so could easily yet rate higher than his current mark of 111 which leaves him just 4lbs to find on Century Dream. Sir Busker was 2nd here as a 2yo, won a low grade handicap here as a 3yo and his only unplaced effort at this course was in the Golden Mile two starts ago when getting no run on the rail whatsoever.

The main concern with Sir Busker would be his ability to handle small fields. He’s a real hold up performer who needs a decent pace to aim at so it stands to reason he’d generally be better in bigger fields. He has won in 8 and 9 runner fields, albeit off much lower marks in handicaps, but was outpaced in several smaller field races last year (often at shorter trips than this).

The key here to Sir Busker is going to be the early pace.

Celebration Mile Pace Map

Benbatl is likely to lead with Century Dream well placed just off him. It doesn’t look like there will be a strong pace which could inconvenience Sir Busker. If Benbatl ends up being withdrawn because of the ground then there is likely to be an even slower gallop and that pushes things more in the favour of Century Dream and less in the favour of Sir Busker.

They say ‘class horses go on any ground’ but the evidence in this race is that several of these are going to find conditions (not just the ground) against them. Century Dream seems to have everything going for him and Sir Busker is not far behind.

I wouldn’t put anyone off either of these runners who are available at 11/2 and 9/1 respectively at the time of writing. Unfortunately with just 7 runners each way betting is far less attractive. However it could be worth maximising the value from this race by backing both Century Dream and Sir Busker in a reverse forecast.

Using Query Tool to find Heavy Ground Angles

It's been raining. Rather a lot. Those courses which have dodged the abandonment bullet are largely racing on heavy ground just now, and that presents a challenge for us punters because most horses have little or no form on such a testing surface.

So how do we mitigate for this? Plan A for most is to guess. Not ideal.

Plan A for Gold subscribers should be to do a little digging; and in this shortish video I'll show you a couple of ways - via Instant Expert and the Query Tool - to home in on those sires whose progeny might be worth marking up when the mud is flying.

 

Hope that's useful.

Matt

p.s. It's Royal Ascot next week - whoop! - and if you haven't yet secured your Gold subscription, you can take a £1 trial here (new users only, please). Alternatively you can access a short-term seven-day sub for just £12 by clicking here. Good luck!

BIG New Additions to Geegeez Gold

I'm really pleased and excited to be able to announce some significant upgrades to Geegeez Gold today. They are:

  • User notes and ratings
  • Instant Expert inline form, and 'select a rating'
  • *IV3* Draw feature

The video below demonstrates how they work and, below that, I've copied sections from the User Guide for those who prefer to read rather than watch/listen.

I'm already using the new features myself every day and I'm sure many of you will soon find them as indispensable as I do.

 

Here are the relevant User Guide sections...

Instant Expert Inline Form

As of April 2019, users may now select a particular form ‘block’ with a click or tap and view the related form lines.

For example, clicking anywhere in the ‘[2][2][100]’ Course block for Flying Verse opens an inline block with that horse’s two course runs in the selected context. The chosen block is highlighted.

Click the block again to close the inline form, or select another block to view further form.

IV3 Data

Introduced in April 2019 is IV3. IV3 stands for Impact Value 3, and is simply an average of a stall and its nearest neighbours. For instance, the IV3 of stall six would be the average IV of stalls 5, 6 and 7.

N.B. Stall 1 is calculated as the average IV of stalls 1 and 2, as is the highest stall.

This simple calculation helps to smooth the curve on our draw charts and isolate genuine biases, as in this example:

 

User Ratings and Notes

A major new addition in April 2019 is the ability for users to add notes and up to two ratings per horse performance.

Ratings Setup

Before adding ratings, many users will elect to create scales which enable auto-calculation. These are simply pounds-per-length calculations based on distance and optionally going. This is undertaken via the My Ratings Settings page, found in the Notes & Ratings dropdown on My Geegeez.

My Ratings Settings

The My Ratings Settings page looks like this:

Each of the blocks represents a different combination of race code and going range. These are the default settings, and ratings are calculated based on the priority sequence of the blocks (in case of overlap between race code/going range).

Users are able to add or remove blocks using the buttons; re-sequence the blocks by dragging and dropping them; and also to restore the defaults.

Once any setting revisions have been saved, ratings for beaten horses will be calculated automatically based on these settings and the winner’s given rating.

 

Adding Notes and Ratings

Notes and ratings are added from within a race result. The default layout is for the functionality to be hidden. Clicking ‘Show Ratings’ to display the ratings features.

Once ‘Show Ratings’ has been clicked, the page re-formats as follows:

Adding Notes

Notes may be added at the MEETING, RACE or HORSE level. Notes are auto-saved when a user clicks elsewhere on the page, but it is strongly recommended to use the ‘SAVE’ buttons provided.

Adding Ratings

To add a rating, enter the winner’s figure into the box Rating 1. The Lbs/Length box is pre-populated based on the Rating Settings page data but may be over-written if required.

By default, R1 and R2 are both checked, which allows a user to create two ratings at the same time. However, the ratings would be calculated using the same Lbs/Length scale. If, for example, R1 was a form-based rating and R2 was a time-based rating, a user may want to use different figures for the winners but have the beaten horses’ figures calculated from the same Lbs/Length scale.

If a different scale is required, the user must uncheck R2 whilst producing the R1 ratings; and then uncheck R1 (and check R2) to produce the R2 ratings. Most users will only produce one set of ratings.

Once the winner’s rating has been entered and the CALCULATE button pressed, the beaten horse’s figures are automatically calculated. Click ‘SAVE RATINGS’ to save.

Viewing Notes and Ratings

Notes and ratings may be viewed within the Full Form tab. Ratings are displayed on the right-hand side. N.B. Users must opt to display the ratings from the My Racecard Options section on the My Geegeez page.

 

Notes are displayed by hovering over elements of the form line, as follows:

Datemeeting note

Race / Conditionsrace note

Race Outcomehorse note

Exporting Notes and Ratings

Users may export any generated notes and ratings content to csv from the My Geegeez page. Select the ‘Notes & Ratings’ section, and then click DOWNLOAD CSV.

**

For the lowdown on all features inside Geegeez Gold, check out the latest edition of the User Guide which can be found on your My Geegeez page.

And if you're not currently a subscriber to Geegeez Gold, you can take a 30 day trial for just £1 by clicking here.

Matt

Geegeez Gold Case Study #1

I received an email yesterday from a subscriber, Jack, who was struggling to make Gold work for him. He had a fairly set way of doing things on another site (absolutely fine, of course) and the migration to Geegeez was a challenge. Of course, we humans largely resent change - I certainly do!, so there's needs to be a good reason for making the switch. I like to think that we offer a plethora of such good reasons.

Anyway, in answering Jack's email, I thought the content might be useful to others, so I've reproduced his questions and my responses below. I will try to do occasional case studies like this to help introduce the various elements of Gold, and how you might incorporate them into your own betting.

OK, here goes - Jack's note first, and then my reply:

Hi Matt

Thanks for taking the time out for this. As I said to Chris I don't know how you guys manage to fit everything in to 24 hours/day!!??

Anyway here goes.

I use Classes 3 - 5 handicaps up to 1 mile on the flat and Classes 2 & 3 handicap chases up to 3 miles over jumps. Prefer to see no 3YOs in flat races and so prefer the 4+ races to the 3+ but they're a bit scarce after the first month or two. 3YOs can make big improvements as they grow stronger with age and gain experience but unfortunately there's no way to calculate that.

On the flat I like to find horses which have previously run well at the course and distance and have a chance when comparing today's OR to their last few runs and hopefully their run/s at today's CD, using the admittedly over-simplistic 1lb/1pt OR for each length beaten no matter the distance. I prefer the race to be at the same class or below that of it's usual races.

As an example if we stick with Joegogo in the 7.45 at Chelmsford on Thursday I can immediately see that 6 runs ago it ran in a class 3 over CD and came 4th of 6 but only beaten 2L, that it is now 6pts OR better off in today's race and, hovering over the race to bring up the comments, I note that it led in that race, faded late on and lost 2 places. I would expect it to do better in this weaker race so should at least make the frame. Looking at its last 3 races there are conceivable (admittedly a bit feeble) excuses for all of them! 3RA Wolves - came after a break so maybe not completely wound up, 2RA Southwell couldn't get the lead, LTO Lingfield, not a course brilliant for front runners and faded in final furlong over 6f. Now back at 5f.

Will be interesting to see if Adam Kirby again takes the ride although I would prefer a good apprentice to a) take a bit of weight off and b) hopefully deflect the bookies/other backers away from the horse - Adam's presence on it's back would probably lose a couple of points but would at least point to the horse being fit and well and having a chance.

All the above takes me only a minute or two, having done it for so long.

I would then switch to GeeGeez Gold to check the draw, pace and to quickly find out how the other runners in the previous Chelmsford race did as well as its last 3 races. Unfortunately this can only be a rough guide as without digging deeper there's no way of telling if those that have run since did so in better or worse races. If a horse/s still looks promising on Gold I would then go back to the RP to do the deeper digging.

Over the jumps I simply look for horses which have been running in better class races than today's. Not too bothered about the OR. Look to back those which have previously done well at the same type of course as todays, if not having run there before e.g. tight left/right handed, left handed galloping etc. So if a horse has been running well at say Market Rasen, Ludlow and Taunton I wouldn't be in a rush to back it at a left handed galloping course. Having backed horses since Blakeney won the Derby back in 1968 I know all the courses by heart so that only takes a couple of seconds. I don't bother over much with either the distance (as long as it's under 3m) or the going over jumps as I've missed winners doing that. I think the 'sloggers' come into their own once past 3m and find it difficult to evaluate those races.

In both codes I don't check how the trainer's doing - if badly then maybe today's runner will be the catalyst for a revival in stable fortunes! And if a 7lb claimer hasn't scored yet then maybe today's the day! So maybe I look a bit too much on the bright side! Also, as Gold has good info on trainers, jockeys and combos etc, I do realise that I'm not using it to its full extent but think that sometimes simple is better.

As I mentioned before all the above does not take long on the RP site as I've been doing it for years and I can fairly quickly go through all the runners in a race but it seems much slower for me when I use the Gold site. Maybe it's just a case of getting quicker as I use Gold.

The other thing that bothers me about Gold is that sometimes the draw advantage seems to come from relatively few races, especially when compared to FlatStats as I mentioned before. I like the way FlatStats lays it out e.g.'472 horses from 44 races analysed. Date range: 11-Jan-15 to 06-Dec-18' and followed by the charts. As it's free for this I tend to use it quite often.

Well that's enough of my ramblings and please don't spend much of your precious time looking for ways to help - I'm probably beyond help anyway!

All the best

Jack

 

Some really good and interesting points - and here is my reply...

 

Hi Jack

There is nothing in what you do that cannot be done on Geegeez. Regarding race selection, you can use the filters on the cards menu – I’ve filtered for C3-5 flat handicaps today in the first image below.

 

Race card menu filters for handicap, race code and race class

Race card menu filters for handicap, race code and race class

Course and distance form: best view is Full Form, where you can select the ‘course’ and distance’ filters. Joegogo Chelmsford example below. I’ve also checked Proximity Form there, which gives a traffic light view of how well the horse ran based on race distance and beaten lengths. Also on Full Form, you can see DR and RS columns: they tell you the draw – in this case six (of six) – and run style, in this case Led. Filtering a horse’s form by wins and/or places often highlights a pace preference/requirement; it also offers clues as to whether a horse ran well from a poor draw, or poorly from a good draw, etc. Finally, at the right side of the form line in Full Form, you can see that the race in question has R W P W% P % - that shows the subsequent form of the race. In this example, 18 runs, 0 wins and 3 places. So not spectacular in truth.

 

Full Form with Proximity form, Course and Distance checked

Full Form with Proximity form, Course and Distance checked

 

Checking Instant Expert will reveal overall form at the respective course, distance, class and field size (going too). The final column compares today’s OR with the horse’s last winning OR in this code. Again below is Joegogo, where we can see he’s four pounds below his last winning OR on the all-weather. (I have my settings to last 2 years form, and race code/hcap contextual – i.e. when it’s a handicap, this view is only showing me handicap form, and when it’s all-weather, it’s only showing me all-weather form; when it’s both, it’s only showing my AW handicap form).

 

Instant Expert shows form against the race conditions, and also an OR comparison against the last win in this code

Instant Expert shows form against the race conditions, and also an OR comparison against the last win in this code

 

For the jumps, you could use the Class Move report as a starting point – it’s here – and sort by those dropping in class. See image below. The reports are a treasure trove, and it’s worth spending a little time messing around with them, as you’ll discover all sorts of ‘ins’ to various races.

 

Class Move report can be sorted to show those horses stepping down (or up) the most in grade today

Class Move report can be sorted to show those horses stepping down (or up) the most in grade today

 

Regarding looking for horses which have done well on today’s type of course, again Full Form has filters for course direction, general profile and specific profiles, so you can easily see how your potential class droppers have fared on similar tracks. I personally think trainer form is more important than you do (!), but I always check the place percentages as well as the wins. They tell far more of a story than the headline win numbers. (We have green and red form indicators on our racecards, but I never use those without checking the place data, as I say).

Going for me is only important when it’s heavy or good to firm (jumps, firm on the flat). Extremes isolate the proven types, and I have a ‘rule of two’: once may be a fluke, twice almost certainly was not.

On the matter of draw, I think one needs to find the right balance between enough data in the sample, and the data being relevant to today’s race conditions. For example, looking at seven runner races is not useful when considering a 16 runner race. Looking at all data is not terribly useful when considering a soft ground flat race (the draw bias can change almost 100% from firm to soft at some tracks). We have dropdowns on our draw tab, but more than that we have ‘guide lines’ which show ‘all going’, ‘all field sizes’, and ‘all races’, so you can see how the ‘micro’ dataset relevant to today’s going and field size maps against the bigger (but less specific/relevant) datasets. I’ve included an example from Southwell today, where you can see that the overall draw data (fainter lines) would mislead you when compared against the specifics for today – also note that I again tend to use place data as it is more comprehensive.

 

The fainter lines show that the overall draw data might mislead a bettor. There is very little bias against today's conditions.

The fainter lines show that the overall draw data might mislead a bettor. There is very little bias against today's conditions.

 

I do appreciate it’s a fair bit to take in, and obviously it’s different from RP because there’s a heck of a lot more on our site. But I think you’ll be able to absorb these different elements quickly enough if working on them one by one. Gravitate to Geegeez rather than trying to do it all in one go, that’s my suggestion.

Hope that’s helpful,

Matt

****

And that was that.

It won't be possible for me to go into such detail for all who want some pointers - and, naturally, the first port of call is the User Guide and/or the videos I recently recorded. All of that helpful content can be found on your My Geegeez page.

But I will try to occasionally share something like the above.

If you're not currently a Gold subscriber and you've read this far, you must be interested in what you might be missing. Hopefully this has been an appetising little taster. If you've never tried Gold before, you can get access to everything for your first 30 days for just £1.

CLICK HERE TO CHECK US OUT >>

Good luck!

Matt

Instant Expert v2.0 is LIVE

It's live, the new Instant Expert v2.0. Or maybe we'll just continue to call it Instant Expert, eh?

Most importantly, if you're in the Remain camp, do nothing and Instant Expert will continue to display the data as ever it did. However, if you're an Instantexpiteer (see what I did there? Not great, granted) then you'll want to have a watch and a listen to the below videotape, which explains all...

There is also an updated User Guide that outlines the changes. You can get that from the link on the My Geegeez page.